Zoom ili Prime

branko_k напиша: mviktor напиша: Mozebi pred 30 godini imalo razlika vo kvalitet, no deneska razlikata medju dobar zum i prime e nezabelezitelna. viktor, dali go otide na linkot sto go postirav?

Da da... bash za toa zboram,  macro objektivot go zatvorile a zoomot go otvorile do daska i posle gi sporeduvaat

mviktor, ne se slozuvam, zatoa sto prime-ovite dovolno e malku da gi podzatvoris, 1/3 do 2/3 stop i da ja dobies maksimalnata rezolucija. Tie se optimizirani maksimumot da go dadat od f2-f4. Zoomovite od druga strana maksimumot go imaat of f5.6-f8. Sekoja cest na isklucotite .
Eve i vo primerot na branko, 70-200 f2.8 e zatvoren na f4, no ni od daleku ja nema mikrorezolucijata na prime-ot.

DZIRNI GO I EF180 mm f/3,5 L Macro usm. Me interesira kade se pozicionira vo odnos na ostanatite macro leki

Ajde de Tegla, kolku za zoomerot?

Hehe.

(Tegla kje snima na Vilm. YES!!! )
ARRI? 435?

===========================

Ammm....

Prime - Zoom.

Koga mislam na 35mm Adapter za video camera,
mislam vednash na Prime. f2, f1.4...

A kako kje se spravam so fokusot,
toa e druga prikaska.


Koga slikam za prijatel negovi dela (maslo na platno),
18-135 kit zoomerot  na Nikon vo D80 kit,
gi "vitka" stranite/kjoshinjata. Pernici

A'mn.

Se se tamanam da napravam testovi i postiram tuka.

Ne sum probal so pomaliot zoomer od D70s kitot pa da sporedam.

A sakam da probam i so prime,
pa kje kazham razlika dali kako ima.
(Pinc/Barrel dist).


Ushte nekoja misla...


Pri snimanje so filmska (motion picture) camera,
velat deka koristenje na primes bara od cinematograferot da kazhe tochno koja lekja.
Nezgodno e da se razglobuvaat i pak montiraat
shinite za dolly + se m'kne camerata so
site trakatanci bidejki ja utnal lejkata, ne im "pokrivala" dovolno.



E so  zoomerot mala korekcija vo kadar nema da nashteti.


Shto drugo...

A, najvazhnoto!

So prime nema vekje igranje kako so zoom.
Op napred, op nazad!
Kaj so vkus, mnogu povekje bez -> zoom radi zooms sake! (igrachka)

Jasno zboruvam tuka za podvizhni sliki.

Ako sakash blizok kadar i kje go mrdnish zadnikot do mestoto na
nastanot.

Ili unazad.
- "Chekaj da vidam kade gazAAAAAAaaaaaaaaammmmmm....." (se gubi vo dalechina....)

P't't't' (bog da chuva)


Osciliram so izjavite...

I Prime i Zoom.
Spored potreba i merak.


(i availablility)

-----

Sum chital deka Roman Polanski go snimal "Pianist"
so dve fokalni dolchini (Tegla ne si sam), ama shirochki.
Kako i "Oliver Twist".

Eve kratok izvadok od "American Cinematographer":

"Polanski’s pictures are distinguished by the use of very few wide focal lengths. Edelman recalls that The Pianist was principally shot with two lenses, 27mm and 32mm, and he notes that Oliver Twist was shot with a 21mm and a 27mm. Lens choices “happen on the set,” says the cinematographer. “Roman has been shooting his movies with one or two lenses all his life. He likes wide lenses because he likes to see the characters integrated with the space.” The director adds, “A wide-angle lens gives you more depth of field, which is important when things that happen in the background have to be sharp, so that counts also. Of course, there is also more sensation of movement with a wide angle because you see more of the perspective change — the things on the sides of the frame move more than the things in front.”


Pozdrav

Igor


PS: Tegla, da ne go kradam postot ama me interesira.
Zhelabata za snimanje na reklamata so film...
Od praktichni prichini (SloMo, dynamic range (exterior), DoF) ili
you got the Itch ?

Ај и јас да гукнам нешто.

Mire ne mora da menuvas objektivi,nosisi po2-3 aparata i na sekoj poeden fiksen















http://www.blissvp.com

zatko напиша: Mire ne mora da menuvas objektivi,nosisi po2-3 aparata i na sekoj poeden fiksen I eden sherpas kako shto bi rekol Bobi za da ti pomaga kako onie na golf shto im pomagaat :) LOL Abe nie hard core fotografi sme ili shto :) http://www.blissvp.com