Тројство

Секој може различно да разбере и различно да го примени тоа што го разбрал... така што - секој си го носи своето бреме...

Да... и само Тој ја знае...

Zosto da mora vo potpolnost sekoj da moze da go poznae Boga, onakov kakov sto e? Zarem sekoj moze da go razbere sovrsenstvoto? Kako sto kazav vo prikaznata za monahot i deteto, postojat raboti koi se nad nasiot razum, i pred toa treba da se smiruvame. Bog ni se otkriva onolku kolku sto mozeme da go spoznaeme. Dokolku mozeme da gi razbereme site Negovi tajni, znaci nasiot razum go izravnuvame so negoviot! Da se ponizime pred sovrsenosta Bozja!

Vikenti,znaeme deka Bog ne moze da se spoznae vo potpolnost. Svesni sme deka tuka sme ograniceni i nesmeeme do tamu da talkame. Nie poprvo samite ne se poznavame. Ne sme svesni kolkava misterija e samiot covek i sto se krie vo nego. Nikoj ne se potrudil da se spoznae samite a kritikuvame drugi.

Nie tuka zboruvame za Osnovnoto veruvanje.
Dali e EDEN Bog ili se trojca. Ova e osnovno koe treba da go znaeme. Velite tri vo eden se. Ako e taka prasuvame i barame da ni objasnite. Togas velite "dzaba e,ne svakjate,ne vi raboti svesta"

Bog ni se otkriva onolku kolku sto mozeme da go spoznaeme.

E toa celo vreme zboruvam jas. Ni se otkriva onoklku kolku sto moze covekot da razbere i negovata svest.Vo sprotivno nepravedno e da ne' povikuva na odgovornost !
Sto bi me povikal na odgovornost sto ne veruvam vo Trojstvoto ako samiot toj me ogranicil da nemozam da go svatam i sam znae deka e nesvatlivo !
Ke recete kako togas Nie go razbirame ?!

Ako amerikanec se rodi i porasne vo makedonija (na primer) toj zivotot bi go dal za nea. No koi se korenite ? So ova sakam da kazam deka toa e nasledno od roditelite.
Bezbroj pati slucajot so zenata vo Bosna i so decata go kazav,koga vo kamenjata veruvale kako vo meso. Taka gi naucila majkata.

Messenger,
za razlikite isto taka bezbroj pati se pisuvalo.Do koga li ke filozofirame ?

Nema sto da se debatira tuka,sosema e jasno. Ako e Bog SAMO EDEN togas i negovata objava e SAMO EDNA.
Ne mu objavil nisto posebno na Mojsie od ona sto mu go objavil na Isus,samo sto go nadopolnil zakonot a nisto ne e smeneto.Nitu ima razlika pomegju objavata Isusova a.s od onaa koja na Muhammed s.a.w.s mu bese dadena (Qur'anot) samo sto i toj bese nadopolnet i konecen,zavrsen.
Zapamti Messenger,nie ne zboruvame za razlikata pomegju lugeto,tuku za OBJAVATA,Verata Bozja,PRAVIOT PAT !
Toj pat e EDEN,na toj pat sekoj upatuval od pratenicite Bozji.

No lakomosta kaj lugeto patot go izmenile !

Inaku,nie blagodarni sme na Sozdatelot sto ne sozdal razlicni.

Da bi se pokazala sposobnosta na eden Hirurg,prethodno nekoj treba da ja skrsi nogata !

Znacenjeto na medicinata ke znaeme da go cenime tokmu togas koga bolesta masovno ke zahara !

AKO NE POSTOESE OBICNIOT BAKAR,KAKO KE SE ZNAESE ZNACENJETO NA ALKEMIJATA ?

Nasite mani ni ukazuvaat kolkava e se'mokta Bozja (Allahova) i dobrotata.

Sprotivnosta se pokazuva so sprotivnosta. Slasta na medot se znae posle luto sirce !

Dodeka covekot ne gi spoznae svoite mani,nemoze da odjava na konj prema sovrsenstvoto.
Sku si go umot.

Neka ne go sedla konjot i neka ne java prema Gospodarot onoj koj misli deka e potpoln i sovrsen covek.

Ako imas razbiranje,togas znaj deka nema poteska bolest od toa da mislis deka si sovrsen covek.

Messenger,prazni filozofii koi mesto ne drzat,ne bavi se so niv. I samiot znaes deka toa ne e taka i deka nemoze da bide.

Od tvoeto oko treba da potecat krvavi solzi dodeka go izvadis od okoto beganjeto od samiot sebesi.

Ako mi kazes deka ne se cuvstvuvas poznaen od site nas,togas povtorno samiot sebesi ke se izlazes.

No da znaes,bolest na Sejtanot bese sto mislese deka e podobar od Adem a.s. Ovaa bolest ja ima kaj sekoj ziv covek.

Koj e zadovolen so samiot sebesi,znaj deka e slomen. Toa e togas na vrvot voda a ispod necistotija.

Da se uveris deka gore e voda a dolu necistija,promesaj gi tie dve,ke osetis smrad.

Vo dlabocinata na nekoi luge e necistotija a nam ni se pokazuvaat kako voda na vrvot.

Na lugeto im e potreben Sejh,koj go znae patot poln so razboritost.Obrati mu se nemu,toj go poznava individualitetot kaj lugeto.

Vistinskiot vodic ke go prepoznaeme po toa sto zboruva mudrosti koi gi dobiva od Allah dz.s

Kaj covekot neznam kolku da e jaka desnicata,toj nemoze da gi popravi slupanostite i tapost na sabjata.
Odi kaj sabjarot da ja popravi ranata na sabjata.

Uste ova.

Po ranite na covekot se sobiraat muvi i ja pokrivaat,da ne vidi covekot kolku mu e pogana ranata.

Muvite po ranata se tvoite misli i imanjeto tvoe.Ranata e tvoja i na tebe.Toa e tvoeto mracno svakanje.

Ako ti stavat Mehlem na ranata,ti ke se smiris i ranata ke ti se isceli.

Sega si ubeden deka Mehlemot ti pomognal i deka ranite ti pominale samo od Mehlemot.

Koristi Mehlem i upotrebi go,no znaj,deka samiot Mehlem ne te izlecil !

Бог,Исус и Духот Свет,...Бог, Човекот и Природата,...
Соломон единствениот голем мудрец во Светата Книга многу убаво кажува за проблемите во Човештвото и нивното вистинско решавање, тоа не е случајно,...зарем не?
Соломон е мудрец вдахновен со Дух Свет премудар и секој ден денес може да го вдахне доколку ги учи и проучува мудростите негови,...Тоа го правеле многумина во негово време и во минатото и денес.Затоа големата премудрост не учи додека сме живи на овој Свет да бидеме стрпливи, смирени,мудри,кротки и благословени.Горделивоста не е доблесна особина , а најмалку човечна и божествена.Учете и читајте повеќе за Светото Тројство на сајтот од ПРЕМИН и многу работи ќе ви се разјаснат,што е тоа?!

ДАЛЕКУ ОД ЗДРАВИОТ РАЗУМ?!
ЗАРЕМ САМО СВЕМИРСКИ ДУХ ИМА ЗДРАВ РАЗУМ
И РАСУДУВАЊЕ, ЗАРЕМ ТВОЕТО УБЕДУВАЊЕ И ВЕРУВАЊЕ СЕ НАЈТОЧНИ???ТАМАН СИ ПОМИСЛИВ ДЕКА ИМАШ ВДАХНОВЕНО И ТИ
ОД СВЕТИОТ ДУХ, ОД ХРИСТОС ИЛИ ИСУС, КАКО САКАШ КАЖИ ГО, ТВОЕ ПРАВО ТВОЈ ГРЕВ,НЕЛИ, ОДМА РЕВОЛТ КОН САЈТОТ НА ПРЕМИН,ПРОЧИТАЈ ДЕ НЕ СЕ ПЛАШИ,АКО ЈАС МОЖАМ ДА ГО ЧИТАМ КОРАНОТ,И ДА СУМ ЗДРАВА И ЖИВА, ТОГАШ СЕКОЈ ЕДЕН МОЖЕ ДА ВЕРУВА И ДА ЧИТА ЗА БОГ ОД СИТЕ СВЕТИ КНИГИ НА ЗЕМЈАВА ОД ВЕДСКИТЕ СПИСИ ДО ДЕНЕШНИТЕ СВЕТИ СВЕДОШТВА ЗА ПОСТОЕЊЕТО НА АПСОЛУТНИОТ БОГ.

Templarius напиша: 6. If there are three persons, why are there not three Gods? The co-equal and distinct persons of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are not three Gods because they share the same essence in complete unity. This is difficult to grasp because we have no comparison that we can experience empirically or with our five senses. For example, the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are three distinct persons and beings. They do not share the same essence or being or divine attributes. However, the doctrine of the Trinity says that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit share the same being or essence, and this is where the human example of the three patriarchs and the divine nature must part company. So the human analogy fails to describe the Trinity and would in fact confuse this doctrine if we took the example seriously. Augustine comes up with an analogy that is deep: the lover, the beloved, and love (The Trinity, Books VIII.14; IX.2, and XV.10). As we saw at the baptism of Jesus, the Father says that he loves the Son, and at that very moment, the Spirit descends and rests on Jesus (see no. 1, above, and Matt. 3:16-17). Augustine seems to say that the Father loves the Son, who receives his love and returns it, for example, in his willingness to obey the Father and die on the cross, while the Spirit communicates the love between them. This image of a triad of love expresses how Christians believe the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit existed before the creation of time and the universe, and how the three persons will forever exist. It is into this love that the Trinity welcomes all believers and all who have received the love of God, through Christ and by the power of the Holy Spirit. Augustine’s analogy is profound, because we have all experienced love from a lover, and we have returned the same love. But it still does not adequately explain how the one God shares this divine attribute of love and all the other divine attributes in three persons. Our human love is but a poor reflection of divine love. We cannot observe this with our eyes, so all analogies from nature and humanity ultimately fail in illustrating the Trinity. Analogies from nature cannot reach up to heaven so that we can connect them to the Trinity. Our finite and limited mind cannot grasp this mystery, even after our minds have studied the doctrine for years. To clarify further why there are three persons, but not three Gods, God’s essence is not divided equally into three parts; it is not one-third, plus one-third, plus one-third. Also, the three persons are not added on to God’s essence or being, as if they are tacked on to the outside of God. Rather, all three persons share the same essence, fully God in one being, in total and perfect unity. Thus, basic Christian doctrine teaches that one God exists in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, not in three Gods, which is called tritheism. 7. However, doesn’t 1 + 1 + 1 = 3? So isn’t belief in the Trinity irrational? The previous section just asserted that all natural analogies fail, and so do mathematical ones. However, since these questions reflect Muslim polemics against this doctrine (a Muslim emailer wrote this to me), we should get into the mathematical arena and answer them. First, multiplication works better with integers: 1 x 1 x 1 = 1 Second, the exponent comes out the same: 1na(tretta)3 = 1 Third, how about an infinite number of sets of things? This works better: Infinity + infinity + infinity = infinity. Let us say that we add an infinite number of red books to an infinite number of white books, and still add an infinite number of blue books to the red and white books. Despite adding these three sets of infinite numbers of books together, we have not augmented or increased infinity by even one book. Such is the mystery of infinity; we cannot figure it out. However, these three mathematical analogies of the Trinity ultimately fail because, among other reasons, the three infinite sets of books have different properties, because they do not exist in perfect unity in one essence, and because we do not "add up" or even "multiply" the three persons of the Trinity. But the infinity analogy does reveal the utter mystery of things that we have never experienced with our five senses. And we have never experienced an actual infinite number of things. Even time is finite, since the so-called Big Bang, which states scientifically that the universe has a beginning. Thus, infinity is a mystery, and so is the Trinity. Belief in the Trinity is not irrational, but transrational—above our puny minds to figure out, ultimately. E ako i posle ovaa imate prasanja togas ..... Mozebi neznaete angliski no sigurno znaete matematika .....se nadevam ......

eve ....