Canon ili Nikon ili obratno

Aj vaka.
Eve vi primeri od fotoaparati koi se po 2-3 MP. Point and Shoot koi nikoj seriozen ne bi trebalo da gi recka, no.......

Canon-PowerShot-S330



Fuji-F401



HP C912



Nikon-Coolpix-2100




Olimpus-C2




Sony-T1



Znaci sto napravile lugjeto so 2MP idioti (kako sto pogrdno se izrazuvame)....
Napravile odlicni fotografii, im ja izvadile masta na aparatchinjata. Znaele kako i sto sakaat. Limitirani do daska ama rezultatite si zborat. Razlikata e sto ne mozat mozebi da gi prodadat vo polna rezolucija, ama sepak zabava do besvest. Ne e do kamerata sepak.
Pozdrav

Ken Rockwell never focus, everything moves into his DoF

Ken Rockwell's shots are so perfect, Adobe redesigned photoshop for him: all it consists of is a close button.

Ken Rockwell doesn't use flash ever since the Nagasaki incident.

ROLFMAO!!!!!!!!

lelele se gazam od smeenje

A SOPRAJTE KO NEMA STRUJA KO VCERA

Eve gi smesnite fakti za ken rockwell
http://www.bahneman.com/liem/blog/article.php?story=Ken_Rockwell_Facts
A za seriozno smeenje do solzi e ova
http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/

Zoran K напиша: D'Dalton Bravo za kazhanoto. Ken go mrazat onie koi si gradat kuli od karti vo nivnite tehnokratski sonovi. Go mrazat zatoa sto im gi rushi tie kuli so edno duvnuvanje na vistinata. Ken e majstor na fotografijata i chovek "down to earth" koj go prenesuva svoeto ogromno iskustvo na ednostaven i laichki nachin, bez zavitkuvanje vo celofan i mlatenje prazna tehnoloshka slama, ne obrnuvajki vnimanie sto na toj nachin ne vleguva vo terkot na "visokopochituvaniot main stream eksperti". A da, go mrazat i onie na koi im go odvitkuva celofanot i na toj nachin gi razgoluva vo javnosta. Vprochem tokmu tie frlaat so drva i kamenja po nego i na siot glas trubat deka Ken nema vrska so fotografija i deka treska gluposti kade sto ke stigne.

@ Zoran i D'Dalton

Dali ste gi poglednale fotografiite na Ken Rockwell? Dali ste procitale ona sto toj pisuva? E ako ne eve mal del od negovite "umetnicki fotografii" i mal del od opusot na Ken:

Sneak Peak Summary

Get the Nikon D200 if you don't mind the weight.

Get a Nikon D40 for everything else.

Get the Canon 5D if you work on a tripod.

Forget the rest.

RAW VS JPEG

If you shoot hundreds or thousands of images in a day shoot JPG and don't worry. The quality is the same for almost all intents and purposes as raw, and the raw files would take gigabytes or tens of gigabytes and resultant hours to download, convert, catalog and burn to backup CDs. In fact, if you shoot this much then JPG can give better quality since attempting to shoot this much raw will constipate your workflow and you could miss making some images entirely as your cards fill up. You'd always be running out of memory cards or time waiting for the acess light to stop blinking.

A eve del od negovite art fotografii (ne velam deka jas imam podobri ama jas ne se smetam za pro za razlika od Ken i onie koi go pocituvaat negovoto mislenje)


http://www.kenrockwell.com/2000/smiths.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/2000/dragonfly.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/2000/frogfinger.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/2000/bosquedawn.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/france/gordc.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/cayman0604/source/img_0214.htm

http://www.kenrockwell.com/2000/sbfld.htm

I kako sto bi kazal Ken Camera doesn't matter :)))))))

Tipov e tolku zabaven samo sto ne mi se veruva deka nekoj go sfaka za ozbilno (mislam deka i on ne se sfaka za ozbilno)  :)))))))

Eve nekolku od internet komentarite za Ken- UZIVAJTE

• Ken Rockwell is the Chuck Norris of photography

• Ken Rockwell's camera has similar settings to ours, except his are: P[erfect] Av[Awesome Priority Tv[Totally Awesome Priority] M[ajestic]

• Ken Rockwell doesn't color correct. He adjusts your world to match his.

• Sure, Ken Rockwell deletes a bad photo or two. Other people call these Pulitzers.

• Ken Rockwell doesn't adjust his DOF, he changes space-time.

• Circle of confusion? You might be confused. Ken Rockwell never is.

• Ken Rockwell doesn't wait for the light when he shoots a landscape - the light waits for him.

• Ken Rockwell never flips his camera in portrait position, he flips the earth

• Ken Rockwell ordered an L-lens from Nikon, and got one.

• Ken Rockwell is the only person to have photographed Jesus; unfortunately he ran out of film and had to use a piece of cloth instead.

• When Ken Rockwell brackets a shot, the three versions of the photo win first place in three different categories

• Before Nikon or Canon releases a camera they go to Ken and they ask him to test them, the best cameras get a Nikon sticker and the less good get a Canon sticker

• Once Ken tested a camera, he said I cant even put Canon on this one,thats how Pentax was born

• Rockwellian policy isn't doublethink - Ken doesn't even need to think once

• Ken Rockwell doesn't use flash ever since the Nagasaki incident.

• Only Ken Rockwell can take pictures of Ken Rockwell; everyone else would just get their film overexposed by the light of his genius

• Ken Rockwell wanted something to distract the lesser photographers, and lo, there were ducks.

• Ken Rockwell is the only one who can take self-portraits of you

• Ken Rockwell's nudes were fully clothed at the time of exposure

• Ken Rockwell once designed a zoom lens. You know it as the Hubble SpaceTelescope.

• When Ken unpacks his CF card, it already has masterpieces on it.

• Rockwell portraits are so lifelike, they have to pay taxes

• On Ken Rockwell's desktop, the Trash Icon is really a link to National Geographic Magazine

• Ken Rockwell spells point-and-shoot "h-a-s-s-e-l-b-l-a-d"

• When Ken Rockwell went digital, National Geographic nearly went out of business because he was no longer phyically discarding photos

• For every 10 shots that Ken Rockwell takes, 11 are keepers.

• Ken Rockwell's digital files consist of 0's, 1's AND 2's.

• Ken Rockwell never focus, everything moves into his DoF

• Ken Rockwell's shots are so perfect, Adobe redesigned photoshop for him: all it consists of is a close button.

• The term tripod was coined after his silhouette

• Ken Rockwell never produces awful work, only work too advanced for the viewer

• A certain braind of hig-end cameras was named after people noticed the quality was a lot "like a" rockwell

• Ken Rockwell isn't the Chuck Norris of photography; Chuck Norris is the Ken Rockwell of martial arts.

• Ken Rockwell never starts, he continues

Изменето од loser - 26.Јули.2007 во 01:45

Stvarno ili nemate rabota ili ste kontra na se,se sto prilozi Dalton e mizi asan da ti baam,nemojte da sporeduvate babi i zabi,tocno deka ako si slikame za doma ili onaka na izlet ke pomines so sto bilo i mene mi se ima sluceno da izvadam odlicni fotografii so Canon ixus60,ama nemojte molimte da kazuvate nonsens,dali site tie aparatcina ke vrsat rabota ako slikas fudbal pod vestacko svetlo,formula 1 ili rely,kosarka i da ne nabrojuvam
Loso e toa sto nekoj clenovi gi donesuvate vo zabluda i kazuvate linkovi od testovi sto ne se relevantni
Edno e profesionalno da se zanimavas so fotografija a drugo e od merak i kejf,zatoa nemoj da davate primeri od fotografii na drva ili sto i da e mislam deka e pogresno


ova sigurno ne e slikano so idiotce,ako sakate da im pomognete na clenovite koj sto doprva ucat fotografija treba da im objasnete ubavo sto i kade se koristi ane demek eve aparat od 150 dill vrsi rabota i pravi DURI POUBAVI SLIKI od toj od 5000 dolari,sramota sto taka nastapuvate
f8/1000 canon400L mm lens
http://www.blissvp.com


Изменето од zatko - 26.Јули.2007 во 01:28

D'Dalton напиша: Zemi toa sto mozes i teraj, pravi go toa od srce i najdobro sto moze. Pozdrav

Top kazano ;)